Talk:European Network of Councils for the Judiciary

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Poland and Holland

Someone changed Poland in this article for Holland (Netherlands). It would be great if the ENCJ would have the courage to critisize the Netherlands because there is a very low degree of transparancy in Dutch Judiciary practice. The standard of transparancy as mentioned in the Bucharest declaration of the ENCJ is: "2 d. Judicial decisions are clearly reasoned and made public." (https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/opinions/resolutionbucharest29may_final.pdf) But helas they did not have that courage as far as I know. So what to do. Can I ad facts about the official degree of publication of sentences in the Netherlands? Or do we have to just follow the subjective views of the ENCJ by just criticizing Poland? Joep Zander (talk) 10:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]