Talk:Panthera gombaszoegensis

Cats High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Panthera gombaszoegensis be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

European Jaguar → European jaguar – Let's be consistent with the articles for nearly all other pantherine cats and use sentence case for the common name title. WolfmanSF (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Standard capitalisation. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Pictures

Hi! Looking at this file, is it possible to get pictures of fossils and the reconstitution of this cat? --92.142.49.232 (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page views

Leo1pard (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request Move

I propose to move European jaguar to Panthera gombaszoegensis. Reason: the current title of 'European jaguar' is misleading (most do not consider it a subspecies of jaguar); also for consistency- the majority of other prehistoric cats are under their binomial name (Panthera crassidens, Panthera youngi, Panthera zdanskyi, etc.]]).--SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this. Leo1pard (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:American cheetah which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Both Panthera toscana and Panthera schreuderi seem to have been accepted as junior synonyms of this species- there are no mentions of P. schreuderi in Google Scholar since 2016 that I could find, and none for P. toscana as an independent species (the name seems to be used as a subspecies name by some workers). Since neither of the two synonyms are notable in and of themselves, I propose that they be merged & redirected to P. gombaszoegensis here. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The age for P. gombaszoegensis in this article is also wrong, this article indicates that they were still extant after 424 kya, well after the supposed "1.95−1.77 million years ago" range, given this I also think the first appearance date is also likely to be inaccurate. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the paper gives an upper range of 2.0 Mya, so near dead on. Also I would recommend WP:BOLDLY merging. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, I effectively began the merge process a long time ago, transferring all the relevant information and sources to this article from the other. This is kind of the final nail in the coffin- if the consensus is to merge, then I will blank and redirect the two articles. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be ok to redirect these 2 into this page, as several authors agreed with Hemmer's assessment of them being junior synonyms. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider bringing one or more of the images in, as this article is short on images. WolfmanSF (talk) 07:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected those two pages to this one. Unfortunately, I do not have the experience or knowledge to mess with the images.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]