Jump to content

Talk:European Flood Awareness System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First version of the EFAS wiki entry has been done. Source is the staff working on EFAS. --Mantees de Tara 10:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Flood Awareness System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Although EFAS gave 3 days notice, it was ignored almost everywhere - one suspects Germany had finished work at lunchtime on Friday, completed housekeeping by lunchtime Saturday, and didn't react Monday. As a result, no preparedness had been taken. Indeed, in Belgium, a decision to partly empty the dam at Eupen in the middle of Wednesday night came on top of the sudden rainfall and wiped out five towns.

Communications are therefore an issue: what methods are used, exactly? Is any verification that a human has actually acknowledged receipt included?