This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it's an existing association, with about 110 000 GHits for the name itself. I think WP:AfD would be a better place to discuss this article. --Shirt58 (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Google hit counts are meaningless numbers. In this case only 274 hits are actually viewable, and many are duplicates or otherwise of little value. 86.128.5.222 (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...it should go through the normal AfD process. I can find at least one addition reliable source[1] that suggests that it might meet WP:GNG. I think we should take some time to find out if there are additional sources, especially non-English sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
