Talk:Eureka, Nova Scotia

Canada: Nova Scotia / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Critique

Holy ****! Does this sound like an encyclopedia to you: "If we could turn back the pages of time to 1877, ninety years ago, stand on the high road and view the scene as it was displayed at that time, what would be seen?"?? Please change! Jgcxelite (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BFE and be done with it!

If this cannot be written even-half way objectively (ie. not like it was written by a tourist company) or cite sources, then it should just say "Located in B.F.E. Population: irrelevant". The author probably meant well, or s/he may own a hostel in the boondocks, where people get chopped up into small bits and pieces to feed to the Wendigo. This article needs more than a re-write... it needs a bulldozer and a skyscraper to mark the land where I couldn't find any useful information when I needed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.213.78 (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Text lifted from other sources

Quite the poetic article. I'll see what I can do to clean it up. Morganfitzp (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've deleted much of the plagiarized text and flowery language. It's a real bare-bones article now—Add more info please! Morganfitzp (talk) 00:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]