Talk:Euphemia and the Goth

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citation

@Srnec: Where in the citation does it mention Mellon Saint-Laurent? Jerm (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the very bottom of the entry are the initials of the authors: JNSL; OPN. You have to look at the table in the front to figure out the full names. Srnec (talk) 00:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Srnec: The book is called The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, your change to the title doesn't go with the isbn. That's misconceptive to the reader. The editor of the book (Oliver Nicholson) is referencing JNSL as his source for his dictionary, his dictionary is being referenced for Wikipedia, not JNSL's book unless of course it was a quotation but it is not. If readers want to verify the source that Oliver Nicholson is using, they can read it themselves via url/page#. The way you are presenting the source is not WP:CS standard.Jerm (talk) 00:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article (not book) is being referenced. Nicholson did not write every article in the ODLA. JNSL is not a source, but a contributor. See here. The article is titled Euphemia and the Goth (in italics, confusingly). You can see here Saint-Laurent's CV in which she lists it as an entry by her in the ODLA. The ISBN is correct because only the ODLA has an ISBN. There is no "JNSL's book", just an entry in an encyclopedia written by JNSL and OPN. I assume you are using Google Books. See p. lxxxi, where it states clearly that "the identity of the author of each entry is indicated by initials". Srnec (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]