Talk:Eucherius (son of Stilicho)

Eucherius (son of Stilicho) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 1, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
February 8, 2022	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine / Classical A‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

A

This article has been rated as A-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eucherius (son of Stilicho)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 23:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add publisher locations to the sources please.
Optional, explain what "making him a vir clarissimus" means. Probably not an everyday phrase for most readers.
I have boldly copy edited. Revert anything you don't like.

That's it. A fine little effort. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Done. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:17, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Passing. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed