Talk:Ethanol fuel in Brazil/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well referenced and well illustrated article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Very well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is quite a long article, so my review took some time do. This is an outstanding GA; my only comment is that you are possibly a bit over enthusiastic about linking, aldehyde for example only "needs" (it may not need any) a maximum of one link in a section, not one link per subsection. Note: aldehyde is a poor example, "hydrated" was far worse, but its the last one I changed.
I suggest that you consider WP:FAC next.
I'm awarding GA-class, it is richly deserved.Pyrotec (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)