Talk:Eternity (newspaper)

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Eternity (newspaper) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Article creation

I created this article to split off the content from Eternity (magazine), which is about a different publication. I also expanded the material, however it needs more reliable secondary sources. I have no doubts it is notable, but such sources do need to be demonstrated. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative?

User:ShootingStar2000, please discuss here why you think the article should say Eternity is "conservative". St Anselm (talk) 23:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.eternitynews.com.au/australia/sydneys-conservative-christians-are-not-fundamentalist/ ShootingStar2000 (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But in this article Sandeman doesn't claim to be conservative himself, nor does the newspaper make that claim. St Anselm (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content to suit a more comfortable/palatable narrative to the Subject. ShootingStar2000 (talk) 00:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative

https://www.eternitynews.com.au/australia/sydneys-conservative-christians-are-not-fundamentalist/ ShootingStar2000 (talk) 00:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undid revision 1050023972 by ShootingStar2000 (talk) This is relevant information and every addition is sourced.

I have reverted the edits made by ShootingStar2000, of significant work I did today to add additional references to Eternity in the media – all of which are clearly sourced. Given that this is the same editor who added their own reference to Eternity in the media – a 60 minutes entry – I can not understand how anyone can justify deleting additional, similar references. I really hope the reason is not because the editor is using a roundabout way of asserting your own analysis and editing this article to have a negative bias? However, I note that this editor has attempted to achieve a similar effect through edits elsewhere in this article. If so, this is considered vandalism and is against the spirit of Wikipedia's open-source, neutral perspective and it will be reported.

It is something of a stretch to claim that the writings of editor John Sandeman in other media constitute media citations of Eternity. Those notations have been removed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]