Talk:Et cetera/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

The Coin Picture

The picture seems like it doesn't have anything to do with the article. Perhaps it should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.81.173 (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Please explain your doubts. I am not the source of the picture, but as I see it, the picture is a clear example of the &c usage. The et ceterarum usage is described as indicating a particular significance. Why change that? JonRichfield (talk) 06:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Excessive use in Wikipedia?

It seems to me that "etc." is used excessively in Wikipedia articles. Is there any discussion of this use, and if so, where?--DThomsen8 (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

pronunciation

This article only says what mispronunciation, but what the correct pronunciation is? Yao Ziyuan 16:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

It's Latin. Depending on where you learned Latin, you'll pronounce it differently. Based on personal experience I'd wager the English pronunciation would be something like "at setter-ruh", which is pretty similar to the way it's pronounced in colloquial German. — Ashmodai ^{(talk · contribs)} 21:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Speaking as an American, I can tell you that I pronounce it "et setter-uh" or "et setter-ah", not "at setter-uh". Elyscape 06:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Typing as an Australian, I can tell you we pronounce it e'seh-tra, et-se-tre, e'tse-trah, e'tse-treh and etSeh-teRA. Or if we want to be really fancy et se-te rah. Depends on ya aksen'. The Pastafarian Church (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Plural and singular & Pronunciation

Should we add eksetra as a pronunciation? In 'straya I hear many people say it sort of like this. Not quite, more a soft old gh or russian xa. I don't know the IPA.

ALSO, et ceteratum is listed as ynonymous with et cetera. I know this would be the Latin singular, but does anyone use it like this? Should we make a comment? After all, the wikipaedia is meant to be a repository of all tid-bits, but is this a tid-bit or something peculiar to Latin students & dictionary readers? Why do I not rewrite it instead of having so many disjointed question? No idea, you? The Pastafarian Church (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Et Cetera versus Etcetera

The Spellings and usages section states that "The one-word spelling "etcetera" is commonly used and is accepted as correct by many dictionaries." In my Merriam-Webster (American English) unabridged dictionary, et cetera is given as a phrase from latin that means "and others especially of the same kind : and so on : and so forth," just like the lead of this article; but it gives etcetera its own entry, as a noun, with the meaning "a number of various unspecified persons or things." The sentence in the article which I'm questioning is cited with an Oxford (British English) dictionary, although specialized as a dictionary of historical principles, and not unabridged. Does anyone have easy access to an Oxford dictionary, preferably unabridged? If Oxford and Webster agree, we should change the sentence. If Oxford merely gives etcetera as a variant of et cetera, then we can give coverage for both dialects.TheCensorFencer (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)