Talk:Estradiol (medication)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Estradiol (medication) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Estradiol (medication).

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lithium (medication) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foundations 2 2019, Group 2a goals

- Add usages, especially in IVF - Expand on side effects and overdose. Include unopposed estradiol therapy Laurafansun (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Group 2C edits for group 2a

1. The group’s edit have improved the knowledge base for estradiol medication. In terms of Menopause, the editor clarified that using estrogen alone would increase risk of endometrial cancer. As well as emphasizing that menopausal hormone therapy may not be for suitable for everyone especially based on certain health comorbidities. However it would be best to include an additional source to support this statement.

2. Yes, the group has achieved their goals of expanding information about estradiol therapy for menopausal therapy.

Q1: The draft reflects a neutral point of view due to encouraging patients to seek medical care prior to initiating estradiol therapy. Blu65 (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Q2: Yes, editor provides verifiable source for edits. For statement including that estradiol may not be suitable for all patients however it would be best to include an additional citation. Crystalnguyentan (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Q3: Edits formatted are consistent with Wikipedia’s manual. Rgonzalezrios (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Q4: There is no evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation. Yalda22 (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Yalda22[reply]

Eek! Found a predatory journal in the reflist

According to the Beall's list, World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (WJPPS) is a predatory journal. Predatory Journals take advantage of authors by asking them to publish for a fee without providing peer-review or editing services.

(In reference to the following source appearing in this article):

Bagade O, Pawar V, Patel R, Patel B, Awasarkar V, Diwate S (2014). "Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception: safe, reliable, and cost-effective birth control" (PDF). World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3 (10): 364–392. ISSN 2278-4357. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 27 November 2016.

 Atomic putty? Rien!  15:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(I'm removing the offending reference per WP:MEDRS) Atomic putty? Rien! 15:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]