Talk:Essendon v Kangaroos (2001 AFL season)/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 22:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

home-and-away match - that suggests this was a two-legged tie? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the largest successful comeback - what does this mean exactly? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
twelve points after trailing by 69 points - see MOS:NUM Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The match saw the largest successful comeback in the history of the VFL/AFL, with Essendon winning by twelve points after trailing by 69 points midway through the second quarter; and, as of the end of the 2023 AFL season, it is the seventh-highest-scoring game in the league's history.[ - very long single sentence. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
seventh-highest-scoring game in the league's history - but the lede doesn't mention a score. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The lede is missing a lot of info. The aforementioned score, but also the scoe of when they trailed, the attendance, the legacy of the match, etc. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gotta say also, the infobox is unreadable if you don't know what the individual sections are supposed to be. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General

Took a bit of a look through this. So much uncited, lots of things missing. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments

I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.