Talk:Espargos

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cape Verde (assessed as High-importance).

Habitants

In the first section of this article the number of habitants is given with 8000, but in the chart and in the section about the historical development it is given with 6173. Can someone explain this difference? -- OBBommel 21:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GDP

"The GDP until the 2000s were low-class" what does this mean? I always thought that GDP (Gross Domestic Product) was a number! Teixant 21:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe they were referring to the GDP per capita, which would (hypothetically) place the average person in a low-class, concerning some national or international normalized scale?.. Have no idea, lol Waldir 21:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Espargos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]