Talk:Espanto IV and V/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note This review is part of a series of reviews by an editor on articles of a similar topic. Because of this, the various reviews may reference each other. Please also see Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Espanto Jr., Espanto Jr. (CMLL), and Los Hijos del Espanto if things are unclear. Disclosure: Both the nom and reviewer are participating in the WikiCup, if need be, anyone may request a second opinion if they feel my review is not following the GA criteria. Thanks. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round three, ding ding.

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

"both wearing the distinctive mask of the original Los Espantos." the mask should be described like it is in the other articles. While the information is easily gotten if the wikilink is followed, the article should be self contained especially since there's no image readers can refer to.
Clarified on the design etc.
"On April 20, 1997, Espanto VI and Espanto V lost a Luchas de Apuestas..." This entire paragraph needs to be edited. I have a vague idea of what's going on but there are a number of grammar errors that make it unclear. I would fix it myself, but I don't want to do a copy-edit and wind up messing it up since I don't really know the sources.
I took a stab at rewriting it, better?
The following paragraph could also use some editing. Basically just go over the prose again and make sure it's clear and accurate.
I went over this as well, hopefully it actually improved the article ;-)

I also have some concerns about notability here as well, so you may want to try and find more sources to bolster the notablity claim, but again, not a GA concern

I will see if I can find anything, most of their work was before the internet really covered Mexican indies so it's harder to find. But I will see if I can find anything else to elimiate any questions on notability.

Results

On hold for a to be determined time. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wugapodes: - Thank you for your review, I believe I have addressed the issues, but please do let me know if there are more things to be addressed. MPJ-US 21:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Two more left to go, I should get to those either tonight or tomorrow. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 18:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]