Talk:Es wartet alles auf dich, BWV 187
Appearance
Es wartet alles auf dich, BWV 187 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 28, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Es wartet alles auf dich, BWV 187 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Es wartet alles auf dich, BWV 187/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
I'll check this over soon. JAGUAR 19:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- " Es wartet alles auf dich (Everything waits for You), BWV 187" - not sure why this is in bold when the other articles I've reviewed didn't have this in bold. No concern, of course; just nitpicking
- Ideally the lead should be condensed into two paragraphs instead of one large middle paragraph and two short sentences
- It's bold in all articles when I write them because it's a redirect, and known better by English-speaking people than the long German. We have a user who likes to change it to a link. For me, the bolding is more important, and the link can be found in the infobox and a footnote, for those who really don't know what BWV means. --GA
- " The duration of the cantata has been stated as 25 minutes" - why has been stated? By whom? Perhaps it would sound better just as The duration of the cantata is 25 minutes or even The cantata is around 25 mintues long.
- Someone worded it like that, and I keep copying, but like yours better. - "by Dürr", the ref.
- "edited by Leo Treitler, with a critical report in 1967" - how about edited by Leo Treitler, followed by a critical report in 1967}
- like it --GA
@Gerda Arendt: I couldn't find anything major enough to put this review on hold, so I'm going to pass it outright. It is well written, comprehensive and all of the sources check out. I noticed that you also improved some things carried over from the previous review too! JAGUAR 19:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! Did you see my growing Christmas greeting, with a link from the lead image on my talk? It's also for you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's lovely! Thanks Gerda. JAGUAR 19:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! Did you see my growing Christmas greeting, with a link from the lead image on my talk? It's also for you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)