Talk:Error-tolerant design
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Invalid Example?
[edit]I don't see how the use of NiMH batteries is an example of error-tolerant design. As far as I'm aware there is no information to support the theory that NiMH batteries were introduced to address the issue of portable music players being left turned on. Can we have the example removed or replaced with a more relevant example? As this is a quite slow-moving page, I've taken the liberty of removing the example for now, but if anyone has reason for it to be reverted, go for it and add an explanation here. - Gnack 04:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Agreed - error tolorant full-text search however is rarely performed with Levenshtein - too costly in terms of CPU power - I added soundex to your Google example and changed levenshtein distance to general edit distance D'Artagnol (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Error-tolerant design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901223851/http://www.sics.se/~joe/thesis/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf to http://www.sics.se/~joe/thesis/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)