Jump to content

Talk:Ernie Shore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 17:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ernie Shore in 1915
Ernie Shore in 1915

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ernie Shore; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ernie Shore/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Muboshgu (talk · contribs) 15:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 07:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this! Arconning (talk) 07:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Arconning, all points responded to. Thanks for the review! – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Baseball career

[edit]

Later life

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • Images have proper licenses and are relevant to the article.
  • On the third image, why is the "(right)" italicized?
    • I got in that habit long ago. MOS:CAPFRAG says in part The text of captions should not be specially formatted (with italics, for example), except in ways that would apply if it occurred in the main text. Several discussions (e.g. this one) have failed to reach a consensus on whether "stage directions" such as (right) or (behind podium) should be in italics, set off with commas, etc. Any one article should use a consistent approach throughout. It's consistent with the other image that he shares with another person.

Refs

[edit]
  • Random ref check: 1, 13, 15, 29, 46, seems good.
  • Earwig picks up nothing.

Misc

[edit]
  • No ongoing edit war, pretty broad information on the topic, focused.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed