This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Ernesto Kreplak, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
I would like to request to cease the removal of the info about Kreplak's role in the jury against Campagnoli. It is the only content for the article coming from sources which are not related to this man (in fact, it is the only content that cites references), and it has a higher political significance than mere education programs. --Cambalachero (talk) 18:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like that this edit is undone, and the "reflist" template is restored to the references section. As I have pointed here, those who remove that portion of the article (the only portion based on sources which are not affiliated to the subject) have never discussed such removal. I have also explained the context and the sources there. The previous thread on this talk page is still without answers, and none of them showed up at the NPOV noticeboard. Note that Lugrac had been informed of that discussion (see his talk page), he simply ignored it and waited for the previous protection of the article to expire to remove the info again.
Cambalachero (talk) 12:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Cambalachero: This looks like a reasonable request to me. I think, however, that we should clarify the wording of "he was denounced". It's important to say who he was denounced by, and perhaps explain what that means, otherwise it seems a little too vague to satisfy WP:BLP. My Spanish isn't so good though - could you suggest an alternative wording, if it isn't too much trouble? Best — Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪19:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone also group the issue templates with {{multiple issues}}? They are taking up more space than the rest of the entire article. Appending |small=yes to the protection tag may also reduce clutter. Thank you. -- dsprc[talk]12:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
