Talk:Ernest "Doc" Paulin

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Wow, this is an article that certainly highlights how Wikipedia editors who remove "red links" in articles are destructive to the project. I wonder how many other other articles used to link here. Annoyed, -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain a bit more please? I sometimes remove redlinks if I truly feel there's a strong likelihood of the person being non-notable, but don't always do so.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are removing "red links" for subjects you think improperly given links, subjects you think Wikipedia ought not have articles on, or subjects that if an article already existed on you would nominate it for deletion, no problem. The problem is some editors who make a practice of removing all "red links", presumably in the belief that any possible subject which Wikipedia does not have an article on today is inherently a subject that Wikipedia must never be allowed to have an article on. Of course that approach is harmful to those editors who believe that Wikipedia has not yet achieved perfect coverage of all encyclopedic subjects, or who try to fill in useful gaps via such tools as Wikipedia:Most wanted articles. Regarding this particular article, I have posted a request on the talk page of a user who removed a link to Doc Paulin from the article on another musician to restore the link-- I didn't wish to get in an edit war with the user. From looking at "what links here", I know that was not the only article I (and perhaps other editors) linked to Doc Paulin from only to have the links removed before the article was created. Sheesh, -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]