Talk:Eritrea–United States relations

Embassy of Eritrea, Washington, D.C. was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 September 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Eritrea–United States relations. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Embassy of the United States, Asmara was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 December 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Eritrea–United States relations. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Africa: Eritrea Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Eritrea portal This article is supported by WikiProject Eritrea.

Untitled

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tag was left as indeed this article is one sided and awaits the addition of Eritrean content and viewpoint.Gallador (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think neutrality is the biggest prob here.

is any certain bias alleged?? this cracks me up. let me see if I understand. someone indicates that there is a problem with the article (or it's content, perhaps, right?) fine. any conscientious wikipedian is called upon to help improve. but no one has articulated what's wrong; what needs fixed?!

I think maybe the title is wrong. so often we think that large chunks of what's in an article is wrong for the article. that smells like a name change. or maybe a merge but I don't know of a good canndidate to merge. History of Eritrea is a nice size article-- so I wouldn't merge w/ that. I'll be a round to help if anyone defines the mission.

last thing- when content is suspect, it's good to let readers know. I just think it's so easy to tag, and so much rarer to properly indicate what's wrong and figure out who needs to be satisfied with whatever improvements are made. if the tag-improve culture continues to abound and pervade in this way for moderate-to-low importance articles (I think this one is rather low) one could just set a goal of removing tags and making the quickest dirtiest edits to justify removal. and I think that would be a poop approach. n-dimensional §кakkl€ 03:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eritrea–United States relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5ywEZKW1R?url=http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2854.htm to http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2854.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]