Jump to content

Talk:Erik Mona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biography Info and Reference Available

[edit]

I cannot claim NPOV on this article so I'll post this here and let others edit the page if they see fit. In a podcast interview on Geekerati http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/bc/Geekerati/2008/04/01/Erik-Mona-discusses-Planet-Stories Erik reveals that he was born in April of 1974. I know biographies include this sort if info and this is a verifiable reference. There may also be relevant reference information for this article in The Tome RPG podcast #53 http://thetome.podbean.com/2008/03/24/the-tome-ep-53-erik-mona-pathfinder/ Kirkmona (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

I have removed the {{notability}} tag from this article. Although it could use better sourcing, the article does succeed in establishing Erik Mona's notability, since he is the head publisher of one of the largest RPG companies there is, in addition to being editor-in-chief of Dragon and Dungeon magazines. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She? BOZ (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added a few more refs; it'll take a bit of work to go through google for citations (there's a lot of Wikipedia mirrors with his information on them), so I'll continue another time. For now, the {{importance}} tag is appropriate if a tag must be placed on an obviously notable person's article (Erik Mona is, IMO, a lot more notable than Dan Willis. I'm not going to give up a fight here anytime soon, although I hope that conflict like that isn't nescessary.) -Drilnoth (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the meantime, please restore the notability template, so that other editors are alterted to the need to add sources. Remember, you do not own the article, it is a shared responsibility to ensure it is sourced. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't own the article. However, the {{importance}} tag needs to stay. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would much rather that sources were added to this article. But if you are not going to add any, shall we get some third party views on this disagreement about the validity of the cleanup template in the meantime? --Gavin Collins (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added two more; his notability should be established without the need for these sources, but I'm going to keep adding more for awhile. I need a break for now and will work on it more soon. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Besides, there are tons of bios on Wikipedia that you could argue the same for, such as (I'm not trying to pick on any individual people here; I'm just trying to give examples, and which articles are used was pretty much random) Mercedes Abad, Kim Aabech, Alan Buchanan, Boris Yoffe, Eva Isaksen, and Gene Healy. If you look through more of the articles in Category:Living people, I think that you would find, quite literally, thousands of articles that have even less of a claim to notability than Erik Mona. Maybe you should look over some other categories of articles for a change to help "improve" Wikipedia as a whole, rather than just one section? -Drilnoth (talk) 22:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't vouch for all badly written articles. If we just stick to this topic for a moment, I note that the cleanup template was placed for good reason but removed for...well I don't understand the reason, but what is clear that as no evidence of notability is apparent after it was removed. All that we know from this article is that he is an editor and that he might live in Seattle, Washington (although we have no sources to support this). --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • So kind of you to suggest the article contains false information, or just lies about about the topic. So much for assuming good faith on the part of those editors who originally added the material. Please assume good faith Gavin.Shemeska (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-removed indent-I believe that {{notability}} was removed because most people think that the article establishes notability. Being the publisher of such an important company should establish notability; the article could use better references. I think that {{refimprove}} may be an accurate template, but the actual notability of Mr. Mona seems to be clearly established. In fact, I will add the {{refimprove}} tag momentarily. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you're looking for additional material, it might be worth mentioning that Erik Mona was co-author of an Ennie Award winning book this year, and a number of books his company published that year also won awards at the same event. I don't have a printed source to confirm that off the top of my head, but I was there in the room, two rows back when he accepted the award. But perhaps in the absence of a printed source to satisfy Gavin, that's worthless or lying or something.Shemeska (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erik Mona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Erik Mona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stub to Start

[edit]

Article was moved from Stub to Start status because it has a significant amount of information and multiple references. In addition, the main article has not had a Stub tag for some time. Araesmojo (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Erik_Mona&oldid=1209132307"