Talk:Erik Brunetti/Speedy deletion
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Erik Brunetti. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
There really is no basis for "speedy deletion" anymore. All the text is original, the files in question were removed (even though they were not copyright material) and the person the article is about is "notable", as being part of an ongoing museum exhibition. Re-issuing the notice is simply cyber-bullying at this point.
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because this article does not contain any copyrighted material. --76.168.17.15 (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because this article does not contain any copyrighted material. After having compared the entire text to alleged sources of copy written material, I have found no basis for the speedy deletion of this article. All text on this page appears to be original content. --Aottmw98 (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because the files http://streetwearbrands.info/fuct/fuct-erik-brunetti-moca-“art-in-the-streets”-exhibition/ and http://www.streetartnews.net/2011/03/art-in-streets-show-moca-los-angeles.html no longer appear to be part of this page. --Aottmw98 (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
There really is no basis for "speedy deletion" anymore. All the text is original, the files in question were removed (even though they were not copyright material) and the person the article is about is "notable", as being part of an ongoing museum exhibition. Re-issuing the notice is simply cyber-bullying at this point. --Aottmw98 (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
There really is no basis for "speedy deletion" anymore. All the text is original, the files in question were removed (even though they were not copyright material) and the person the article is about is "notable", as being part of an ongoing museum exhibition. Re-issuing the notice is simply cyber-bullying at this point. --Aottmw98 (talk) 00:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)