Jump to content

Talk:Erica Hahn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleErica Hahn has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Erica's attraction to Callie

[edit]

"In episode 4.12, after weeks of continued persistence, Erica agrees to go on a date with him, to his major excitement. However, Erica's attraction to Callie is also evident in this episode as she watches Callie dance with Sloan."

To me this was ambiguous, and her reaction had at least three interpretation:

  • Erica is sexually attracted to Callie
  • Erica is sexually attracted to Sloan and is jealous/envious to see him dancing with Callie.
  • Erica is hurt b/c she feels abandoned by Callie

75.37.5.224 (talk) 00:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding her to Category of Fictional bisexuals

[edit]

Adding she to Category of Fictional bisexuals Are is it too soon?--Brown Shoes22 (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much yes, too soon. Bisexuality is a genuine sexual orientation. One kiss with one person of the same gender does not a bisexual make. If they get into a relationship, then yes, that's fair. Removing for now. - Lenky (talk) 11:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
She is now add to Category of Fictional bisexuals. Callie Torres was add to the same Category.--Brown Shoes22 (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you read what I wrote. They have kissed twice. Once was a joke. Once was serious. However, they are not in a relationship yet, nor have they slept together. If that counted as bisexuality, you'd have to add that tag to every college-aged woman in America. Removing tags until actual relationship and orientation is confirmed by the show itself. -- Lenky (talk) 05:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Erica Hahn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Successful good article nomination

[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of September 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable wording.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited to WP:V/WP:RS secondary sources - I also see some use of primary sources for the direct information about the character's storyline and her history within the show itself, but this is within reason and acceptable.
3. Broad in coverage?: Article is indeed broad in coverage, covering many aspects of the character's history, reception, and background on the program.
4. Neutral point of view?: Article is written in a neutral tone.
5. Article stability? No issues on the talk page, last talk page post is from May 2008, inspection of the article's edit history reveals some minor disruption from IPs and such but that appears to have been dealt with, just keep an eye on that. No other issues apparent in the edit history going back several months.
6. Images?: The image had an adequate fair use rationale, but I took the liberty of expanding on that on the image page, so it is now satisfactory.
 If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Erica Hahn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erica Hahn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Erica Hahn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Erica_Hahn&oldid=1212514149"