Jump to content

Talk:Eric Fanning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Promotion

[edit]

As of today, he is the new Pentagon chief of staff,[1] but I'm not sure if that position is currently listed on Wikipedia. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 23:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He was "chief of staff" to the secretary of defense. Like number one right-hand aide. It's mentioned. I don't think the position merits a WP entry itself. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 01:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So his credentials are zero military service himself and an undergrad degree in history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.25.194 (talk) 00:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Compare with his predecessor John M. McHugh. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

For consistency, I added the office of Acting United States Secretary of the Air Force. If we list Acting Under Secretary of the Army this should appear as well, it's a more important position. Hekerui (talk) 08:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Partner

[edit]

I don't see any indication that Fanning has a husband or partner. Just "boyfriend". He lives with Ben, but hasn't used a word to characterize their relationship. See Eric Fanning Thanks Boyfriend For 'Patience At Home' During Confirmation Process Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bmclaughlin9, an IP editor keeps adding Ben Masri-Cohen as his domestic partner. He or she refuses to cite a source, and I don't like to even approach 3RR or have to rely on the BLP exemption. It's obvious this is factual, though, and I believe On Top magazine has editorial oversight and would make a reliable source. What do you think about it being in the infobox as "domestic partner" versus being in the article? Again, it does not indicate husband or partner. MisterRandomized (talk) 00:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The term "domestic partner" is a specific legal status, so I don't think it works. The way to handle this is a sentence citing the article, naming the boyfriend, and quoting Fanning a bit to indicate what he implies about their relationship. But no legal relationship means nothing in the infobox. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 01:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eric Fanning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eric_Fanning&oldid=1207179194"