Talk:Look Who's Back

A fact from Look Who's Back appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Er ist wieder da was priced at €19.33, a deliberate reference to Hitler's ascent to power in that year?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/December.

Wikipedia

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to English title?

Given that the book is now available in translation, it would make sense to have main title as the English name--FDent (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (and return this page to the correct name). This is not a book that has had any significant impact in English. Per COMMONNAME, and even just ENGVAR, it should remain in German. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia namecheck

"...for instance, he assumes that Turks in Germany are an indicator of Karl Dönitz having persuaded Turkey to join the Axis, and thinks that Wikipedia is named for Wikinger (“Vikings”)." - is the second one really the best, representative example to be using here, or are we being a bit self-indulgent? I've not read the book. --McGeddon (talk) 21:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've not read the book either. I got that detail from a magazine article. DS (talk) 03:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]