Talk:Equitable Motion Picture Corporation
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussion
[edit]Please discuss here why this draft should be accepted in addition to the article on World Film Company. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think it would be indie to inckude all of the content in the film company that took it over. That company acquired several film companies. Are you gping to inckude the background and history of all of them in this detail? One of them is already a separate article. This film company played a significamt role in early film history and through.the company that succeeded it. That is why it's discussed substantially in reliable independent sources. The article on its successor company does not inckude details about its talent or the films it released and shouldn't. Even if it were merged it should be created and then merged for attrobution. There is no reason for this article to languish in draftspace. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- amerge can be discussed better in mainspace, so I accepted it. , I think the first step would be to see just what films it produced, so we can tell how much content there will be. DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/30 January 2019
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Stub-Class Silent films articles
- Silent films task force articles
- Stub-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles