Talk:Equinox Mountain

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: U.S. counties / Vermont Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

File:Mount-Equinox-Viewer-Center-Construction-2012.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mount-Equinox-Viewer-Center-Construction-2012.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mount-Equinox-Viewer-Center-Construction-2012.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cryonic Tunnel Tidbit

This really needs a citation. Googling the company name + "cryonics" yielded nothing in the first few clicks. Maybe if I kept digging I'd find something, but something this obscure definitely needs to be omitted until a citation is provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.152.225.210 (talk) 05:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Equinox Mountain can be climbed by several different hiking trails."

Can we actually state the hiking trails?

Skyline Drive

Really? The most popular route, by far, to the summit is Skyline Drive, yet I see ZERO mention of it. That’s... pretty pathetic. Famartin (talk) 02:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I’ll add it eventually (like sometime over winter), but if someone would like to do so sooner, it would be nice... Famartin (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

some new material & recasting

I've added some sourced material and recast a few sentences mostly aiming to make them more concise. 35.8.218.249 (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added histor. info on 1860s road from north is attributed to item in 1949 CSMonitor -- a once-great newspaper. However, a CalTop display of an obviously very old USGS Map, that CalTopo says (vaguely) is 1885-1915, only shows a trail on route described in CSM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.10.217.25 (talk) 23:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reference list now 18 items, from 5 items previously

I've added 13 references, although several repeat themselves, so, maybe ten new sources? On the whole, it's an improvement. I'd discourage the "hiking guide" approach to any additional material. Please source whatever. 35.8.219.179 (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]