Talk:Equestrian

A topic of.....

Equestrian sport has been added based on the following http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Aspergillus+fumigatus+horses&btnG=Search --222.64.223.101 (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=airborne+bacteria+horse&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1 --222.64.223.101 (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section

Provides definition but could go into more detail about what all is considered to be "equestrian" such as the various disciplines Too short; not enough information

Content

Gives bullet points of examples More detail would be beneficial Good variety but no real weight to the information Little to no information about this topic

Tone and Balance

No tone as the wiki page is too short and too little information

Sources and References

No sources section, but links provides throughout the page. Essentially seems to be a page to link you to other pages with actual information If this wiki page should stay on Wiki, I believe it should be able to stand alone and have actual content, rather than only string into other Wiki pages

Organization and Writing Quality

Very straight forward and organized as expected Good use of bullet points, but sub-categories could also be useful No outline Only 3 categories

Images and Media

No images or media directly on this page Could be beneficial to help one understand the idea

Talk Page Discussion

Only links have been added No actual talking points Is within the WikiProject Disambiguation

Overall Impressions

Needs a LOT of work if it is to stand alone as a wiki page When researching on Wiki, it seems that other equestrian pages are more beneficial and provide much more detail-if so, why have another page talking about the same thing? Overall, article needs work if it is to remain as a stand-alone Last edited in 2010 Article is not near completion; poorly developed and needs to be redone for better education of the sport

Jlsenn (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]