Talk:Equatorial Guinea at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The delegation included two athletics competitors and one judoka: the sprinter Reginaldo Ndong who was joined by middle-distance runner Emilia Mikue Ondo and half-middleweight judoka José Mba Nchama. - rewrite this From Ndong and Mikue Ondo progressed no farther than the first round of their respective events and Mba Nchama was eliminated from contention in the second round of the contest he was entered for. To Ndong and Mikue Ondo progressed no farther than the first round of their respective events and Mba Nchama was eliminated from contention in the second round of the contest. She qualified for the games capitalize Games After his match, he said while he was amazed at the spirit of the Olympic Games, he would have preferred to have advance further in the competition while also not ruling out competing at the 2012 Olympic Games in London. - rephrase this
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	None suspected
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yup
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Looks good
	7. Overall assessment.	Just some grammar to fix.

@Kees08: Thanks for the review. Every point you have raised has been dealt with. MWright96 (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]