Talk:Episode 6 (Twin Peaks)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the intro should go Plot, Production, Ratings; rather than Production, Plot, Ratings
How's it look now? GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"in the small mountain town" Maybe add, Twin Peaks, just to be clear
Added. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"local businessman Benjamin Horne (Beymer) schemes to burn down its sawmill to further his property empire." -> "local businessman Benjamin Horne (Beymer) schemes to burn down his sawmill to further his property empire."
Oh, it's not his. He just wants to buy the land cheap after he burns it. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"…its broadcast; and has received positive reviews from critics." -> "its broadcast. The episode has received positive reviews from critics."
Done. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe add (FBI) after Federal Bureau of Investigation, so that you can use the acronym later?
Sure. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"difficult to write for convincingly than others" -> "difficult to convincingly write for than others"
Got it. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A−, make that "A−" in quotes
Got one. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make the page super-sexy, you can add publishers to some of the refs, but you don't have to
Think I've got them all.
Is "Bibliography" the right heading if you include a featurette?
Hmm, that's why I generally go for "references"; guess that slipped in somewhere and has been copied since. Fixed now. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I can find. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, chief. Hope Monday goes grand for you. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Everything looks in order. As for Monday, I can now recite the entire meaning of Catullus 16, so I'm feeling better. And the best part is, its dirty. ;)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:41, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]