Jump to content

Talk:Episode 5569/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • What is the image's purpose? (WP:NFCCP#8)
    • I implemented it to illustrate two of the Black characters/actresses involved – if you don't think it's crucial to the understanding of the article then I'm fine with removing it! – DarkGlow14:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Prose seems to explain it just fine so I suggest removing it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDarkGlow19:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot and cast

[edit]
No, but maybe merging both sections would work best to have consistency with other articles. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you point to some examples? Every soap episode article I've seen formats it like this (with actor names in the plot) so I'm not well versed in how it should look. – DarkGlow16:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usually, in television articles I have looked at, the plot has the names of each actor in parenthesis, while omitting the use of #Cast. However, if you decide to have a cast section, it is found redundant by MOS to include the names of each actor also in #Plot. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDarkGlow19:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Sources are archived.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·