Jump to content

Talk:Episode 3 (Twin Peaks)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEpisode 3 (Twin Peaks) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 21, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although her character had been dead from the beginning of the series, Sheryl Lee was asked to return for "Episode 3" of Twin Peaks?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 3 (Twin Peaks)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs) 23:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
  • Initial comment
    • At a start, there are no reasons to quickfail; fairly obviously, this article is in good shape.
  • Production
    • "The episode introduces the character of Maddy Ferguson, the second role played by Sheryl Lee after Ferguson's cousin Laura Palmer." -- WP:SURNAME says after a name is given in full, the surname should be given thereafter. That said, "Sheryl Lee" and "Laura Palmer" should just be "Lee" and "Palmer".
    • "Lee had been a stage actor living in Washington, where "Pilot" was filmed, and had remained there after production moved to Los Angeles as she believed that, with her character dead, she would have no further part in the series." -- Link Washington and Los Angeles.
    • "Rathborne chose to open the episode with a shot centred on Sherilyn Fenn, finding the actress to be "seductive" and "absorbing" in similar manner to screen icon Marilyn Monroe." -- It should say "in a similar manner".
  • Broadcast and reception
    • ""Episode 3" was first broadcast on the ABC Network on April 19, 1990. -- MOS:ACRO says to write out the acronym's meaning in full with the acronym in parentheses after on first mention. That said, it should say "on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC)".
    • "Television Without Pity's Daniel J. Blau praised the episode's black humour, singling out in particular the scene in which Miguel Ferrer's character is punched after an argument in the town morgue. -- WP:SURNAME (only say "Ferrer's character").
    • "However, Blau was critical of guest stars Walter Olkewicz and Clay Wilcox, finding their attempted French-Canadian accents particularly poor." -- WP:SURNAME applies here as well.

v**"Writing for Digital Spy, Tony Delgado has also praised Ferrer's role as Albert Rosenfield, adding that his dialogue "may not appear to be the epitome of wit, but the way [Ferrer] delivered such lines caused plenty of howling hysterics in living rooms across the globe"." -- WP:SURNAME.

  • Footnotes
    • Due to many of the citations being print sources, I was unable to check most of them. However, I did check FN4, 5, 7, 16, 17, 19, 20, & 21; no plagiarism or copyright issues exist. The hopeful lack of copyright violations and WP:SYNTH in the unavailable sources is on the honor system.
    • Coinciding with the above, all reference links are intact.

Overall, very well put-together article. I am placing this on hold for the minor issues to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. I believe I've got everything, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be addressed. GRAPPLE X 21:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

With everything having been addressed, this article now fulfills the good article criteria, and is being promoted. Good job to the nominator and other significant contributors. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Episode 3 (Twin Peaks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Episode_3_(Twin_Peaks)&oldid=1201783849"