Jump to content

Talk:Epinephelus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From French Wikipedia

[edit]

- FrancisTyers 16:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

from ncbi Taxonomy you have 163 and not 99 (Epinephelus). so what is true ? 109.64.141.147 (talk) 11:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the Hyporthodus haifensis is the correct Binomial name for what Epinephelus haifensis. Hyporthodus haifensis.79.182.141.67 (talk) 09:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

Hybrid grouper is about the hybridisation of two species of Epinephelus, namely E. fuscoguttatus and E. lanceolatus. While this is quite probably a notable achievement on the part of the scientists concerned, I'm not certain that it warrants its own article yet. I think it would, however, form a nice little section on this article. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support: I generally support the proposal because, as you say, the Hybrid grouper article probably isn't long enough to warrant its own article. However I feel that it would require a major overhaul of this article so that it isn't just a huge list of wikilinks, especially since so many of them are red links, to prevent it looking too out of place. --Mrmatiko (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most of the red links seem to be links to species in the genus. I've seen elsewhere a separate list article created where a genus has a large number of species (for example, List of Agaricus species, fungi, I realise, but the principle is there). Perhaps that would be an appropriate thing for this article? Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 21:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going ahead and removing this proposal, as it's stale. From the point of view of biology articles, a hybrid fish isn't significant. However, it may be significant for food and food production, as in different types of oranges, breeds of cattle, etc. - Wikidemon (talk) 09:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epinephelus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

name has been changed

[edit]

A recent publication changed the generic name of this species from Epinephelus to Hyporthodus according to this Tmd5488 (talk) 04:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Epinephelus&oldid=1199945471"