Talk:Epigraphia Zeylanica

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Sri Lanka Top‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Footnote styles

Many thanks to those who have filled gaps and added new information. The footnote styles have, however, become a bit inconsistent. Should we not settle on a consistent style? Hope I am not being too fussy. --Shirazibustan (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Shirazibustan[reply]

Hi Shirazibustan. I'll work on unifying the format of the footnotes later today (I used the WP:CITET because they help with machine-readable text, like COinS). However, feel free to be bold and make any changes that you think will help the article. Thanks! Phoenixred (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much, the result looks really good. --Shirazibustan —Preceding undated comment added 21:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]