Talk:Epic poetry/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Epic poetry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Gothinia Chronicle external link

I cut this external link - he is only asking for *voluntary* contributions, but still, it doesn't belong on the list of epics. --MichaelTinkler 15:51, February 25, 2002 (UTC)

external links:

Gothinia Chronicle - Epic Poems of Human Experience

I don't think this qualifies as epic

I don't think this qualifies as epic:

1910s: The Silmarillion by J. R. R. Tolkien (fictive mythology of Middle-earth)

Is there somewhere else it can go? Maybe List of books Tolkien wrote before and as background for Lord of the Rings? Ouch, my head hurts. Atorpen 23:52 Jan 25, 2003 (UTC)

As it certainly does fit the dictionary definition, I assume you mean it doesn't qualify as notable epic poetry. While that's debatable, based on the popularity of Tolkien's works I'd have to answer yes.

On a side note, that other category would more correctly be List of books Tolkien's publisher wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole, forcing him to write the Lord of the Rings instead :-). Mkweise 00:24 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC)

A moot point; it doesn't count as poetry either way.

People seem to be missing the point: The Silmarillion is written entirely in prose. Epic or not, popular or not, it's not epic poetry, and so this is the wrong page for it.

The Law of Fives

I can't find anything on The Law of Fives by Tristan Parker, cited as a 21st century epic. I'm not confident enough about it to remove it, though.

I have deletes The Law of Fives and Ballad of the White Horse: the former because I can find no evidence of its existence, the latter because it is a narrative poem, not an epic. The Silmarillion is not a poem at all. Bmills 10:29, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I have also removed Dante and Spenser, as their poems were allegories, not epics. Bmills 10:40, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Mahabharaata

I've changed the statement that the Mahabharata is the largest literary work in hiistory. The two sites stated below show that the tibetan Epic of Gesar (which currently has no record in wikipedia) is the largest (three times the size of the Mahabharata).

Risk one 03:38, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Dante's Divine Comedy

Wouldn't Dante's Divine Comedy qualify as an epic poem? I always have considered it as such.

Mahabrarata date

1316 is a very precise date for the writing of Mahabharata. Any evidence for this? Zeimusu 13:43, 2004 Oct 31 (UTC)

Turkish Epic

I was just wondering why there isn't any mention of the nomadic epics from Central Asia turk influenced civilization (for example Ouighur, Turkmenish, Kazakh).

I found a comprensive book on the matter ("comparative studies on heroes and epics in Central Asia" recently edited in english from a Chinese house, from the top of my head). I however, do not possess the book anymore, but it mentions many old epics, along with both tibetan and mongolian Gesar/Gisor, they talked about 4-5 different central asian epics (from kazak, ouighur, turkmen and other population i can't recall) including short transcripts of the oral texts in both, native language and translated.

So if anyone know about them, i will be very interested to learn more...

Copyvio image

The image from the mahabharata was copyrighted. It could be used in an article of commentary on the image, (but is probably not notable enough for that) but it may not be used to decorate this article. Zeimusu | Talk page 12:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Koroglu, legendary warrior, subject of many epics in Turkic literature. Folk poetry, Turkish Epic poetry.

Narrative vs. Epic

I think the Narrative vs. Epic section was a rather nice touch to this page. Why was it removed? I think the information should be back, but under a different title than Narrative vs. Epic (or whatever it was).

Oral poetry

I've removed this for making no sense: "In the modern era, as oral composition of poetry has fallen out of favor, epics have increasingly been written in prose." The point of the sentence pre-alteration was that long poems in general are currently unfashionable. The change utterly destroys that point, from something which is reasonable to something which is simply false; the oral, even spontaneous composition of (short) poetry is very much alive and well, and not just in non-literate societies. See Performance poetry and Slam poetry.

The above discussions are preserved as an archive. Please do not modify them. Further comments or new discussion should be started on the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Blind Guardian?

I happen to like them very much, but isn't it a bit far stretched to mention And there that was silence in the same context as Illiad, Odissey and Aeneid? It is a song which is based on the themes of these epics. But itself an epic in the same meaning? Come on ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.235.179.170 (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Sulfuras?

I see a reference to a John Milton epic named "Sulfuras - Hand of Ragnoras". That's the name of a weapon in the online MMORPG-game World of Warcraft. As far as I know, Milton never wrote anything entitled so and I've been unable to find any references to a literary work by that name. Is this an act of vandalism or am I mistaken? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.164.125.108 (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Prose?

I see prose items being added here. Should we be renaming the article or creating another?

I dumped a lot of the prose items (or items I could tell were prose) down at the bottom of the page, under the heading "Prose Epic" (this is a recurring problem afflicting all of the "epic" pages, but is obviously most serious in a page called Epic poetry). Probably this should ultimately be made into a new page by itself: "Prose Epic", or "Epic Prose", or something like that. The obvious problem is that it can easily get weighed down with anything that somebody wants to call "epic"; basically, every hefty summer novel wants to be known as an "epic" work. See the question about The Silmarillion above -- though I admit it has a somewhat better claim than other things on the prose list. Moby Dick is a great, wonderful novel; but it is not an "epic". 68.100.18.183 04:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)RandomCritic

I like how you moved the prose epics to a new section. That's a great idea. However, I have to disagree re: Moby-Dick. Scholars often classify that novel as epic; for instance, see Sounding the Whale: Moby-Dick as Epic Novel, by Christopher Sten. Or search Google for "moby dick epic". You'll see a lot of hits. Rsgranne 31 January 2006

Well, it may be an "epic novel", but I don't think it's "an epic". Anyway, as long as there's a section on "prose epic" there's no particular need to arbitrate the question. I see that "The Lord of the Rings" has been proposed as a "prose epic" in the opening paragraph so I'm moving that down there as well. I just hope we don't end up with "The Bridges of Madison County" there as well. RandomCritic 08:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Epos

Epos redirects here, but there is no explanation on what this term means or its origins. Obviously it's a synonym, but it's probably worth mentioning. —Michiel Sikma, 18:31, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

WorldChronicle.net

Is this an appropriate external link? -proteus71 18:22, 05 Sept 2006 (UTC)

Manas Epic from Kyrgyzstan

Someone HAS TO put in this topic something about the MANAS epic from Kyrgyzstan. Anthropologists and linguists credit this poem as being the longest known poem in human history. It was not transcribed until the mid 1900s (not sure exactly when but it was an extensive project). Unlike all these other epics the Manas epic has shaped the identity of an entire ethnic group so it is rather important (in addition to being much longer than any other epic). The people who passed this story down orally had to go through decades of apprenticeship before they were allowed to tell the story and a recitation can take more than a week.

Be bold and have that someone be you. You have seen Manas (epic) I'm sure John (Jwy) 01:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC).

Goethe's Faust

Isn't Faust an epic? I thought it was. Where is it in the page?

The last edition that removed Goethe's Faust putted that it is a "dramatic poem", and not an "epic poem". --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 16:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

And that was correct. --Wetman 07:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Fenian Cycle

What about the Fenian Cycle from Irish mythology? --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 16:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

De Rerum Natura

And "On the Nature of Things", written by Lucretius in the first century BC? --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 16:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Not an epic. The following misleading text was entered, I suppose, simply to reassure the bunny-rabbits: "As a result of this change in the use of the word, many prose works of the past may be called "epics" which were not composed or originally understood as such." Epic does not just mean "big" ("...went off with an epic bang") and it does not include Xena Warrior Princess. The result of this kindergarten reassurance exhausts all meaning from the word and feeds library-deprived crackerbarrel literary chatter.--Wetman 07:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Many classicists understand De Rerum Natura as an epic poem, of the specific sort known as didactic epic. Other examples would be Hesiod's Works and Days. Not every classicist would agree, of course; the definition of "epic" isn't straightforward. Still, I'd say that De Rerum Natura ought to be on the list. (for a reference, see this review of Monica Gale's Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

DRN is an epic, but not a heroic epic. 2600:8806:340B:E100:A0EA:A3B4:8CB3:563A (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ovid's Metamorphoses

Ovid's Metamorphoses is an epic. I quote the Oxford Classical Dictionary entry on Ovid: "An unorthodox epic in fifteen books, Ovid's only surviving work in hexameters, composed in the years immediately preceeding his exile in AD 8." The Metamorphoses bends the genre of epic, to be sure, but it is still considered an epic by almost any classicist. In fact, many classicists consider any long work in hexameters to be an epic, since definitions based on the content of the poems can't cover the full range of ancient epic from the Iliad to the poem of Parmenides to Aratus' Phaenomena to Works and Days. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

This special pleading needs to be incorporated into the article rather than adding the Metamorphoses to an empty list, which will confuse the Simple. --Wetman 17:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The Silmarillion

The Silmarillion is not poetry; however, Tolkien did write an epic poem (though it was unfinished) called The Lay of Leithian. It was written over the course of five years, and contains several thousand lines. But should it be mentioned here, because it was unfinished? --Narfil Palùrfalas 22:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

If you can find a source that talks about it as being epic poetry, yes, if not, then I'm not sure. GreyWinterOwl (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Added The Ballad of the White Horse

Added The Ballad of the White Horse by G K Chesterton APAULCH 21:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Rearranged a lot of stuff

Rearranged a lot of stuff, separated out prose epics (and others) without deleting entries, divided main poetic epic section into ancient/medieval/modern while retaining century divisions, and added in a good many titles. 68.100.18.183 04:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)RandomCritic

Epic vs. Lyric

Some of the material on here is undeniably poetry (and long poetry at that); but is it all epic poetry? It would be worthwhile examining some of the less-well-known poems here (where they're accessible) to see if they fit the definition. While any two adjacent categories always have some dubious in-between items, most epic poetry is pretty clearly definable: does it narrate a series of interesting events? That's epic poetry, even if in addition to the story told there is an allegorical, philosophical, or political point. Or is the poem primarily an expression of the poet's thought, whether emotional, philosophical, or critical, to which the narrative -- if any -- is totally subordinate? That's lyric poetry. Wordsworth's Prelude, while it does pass through a series of biographical events, seems to me not to be about those events, but rather uses them as a framework to expound his thoughts on this and that. And while I'd be hesitant to confine epic solely to poems that treat of battles, marvellous journeys, and deeds of errantry, I'm also rather of the opinon that Wordsworth's own life was not up to the level of epic interest. :) 68.100.18.183 04:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)RandomCritic

I agree. It weakens the definition when people start slipping things like Bohemian Rhapsody in as examples of the 'epic'. It seems there's a degree of confusion about the colloquial usuage, and the literary conditions necessary for something to be an epic. 131.111.247.12 (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Entirely agree with the previous posts. There is material here that is clearly not epic, and some epics that are not listed. For example neither Paul Revere's Ride by Longfellow nor the collection it was originally in, Tales of a Wayside Inn, are epic in any sense. Missing epics include Gilgamesh, the Epic of Manas among others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.7.84.11 (talk) 23:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

If you call Hinduism "mythology," then call Christianity and Judaism "mythology" too.

The built-in arrogance of the West never ceases to amaze. The entire Old Testament, not just the Book of Job, is epic poetry -- especially Genesis. Let's get honest people. What you call religious texts are not exempt. They contain all the same qualities that denote epic poems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.61.243 (talk • contribs) 04:55, April 19, 2007 (UTC)

If you have a solution to offer, offer it. Venting or ranting about how the world does you and yours wrong can be done from a blog. Proteus71 17:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

You are clearly not well acquainted with the Old Testament. What of the Law books such as Leviticus If one can describe such edicts as 'When the plague of leprosy is in a man, then he shall be brought unto the priest' and 'Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary' as poetry one clearly has no literary scruples. The psalms also, though unquestionably verse, are hymns not epics. But why is this user being attacked? The arrogance of western religion on such matters is and indisputable and indefensible fact. And he has posited a fair, if utterly erroneous, solution: to shunt the entire Old Testament under the 'epic' banner, without a thought for the heroic and elevated themes of the Gospels or Revelations.

The Bible is clearly not epic, since it isn't a narrative poem. As for Scripture as myth, well, the real question isn't whether you can denounce it as myth, but whether it rises to the level of myth. Myth, after all, comes from the Greek μῦθος, meaning (at least in the Homeric sense), true story. A myth is a myth to the extent that it is true. I don't mean literally true, of course, but truth in the sense that poetry is best equipped to convey. Epic poetry, then, aims to tell a big truth, and the literalness of the story is irrelevent to that big truth. It is seems clear that Hindu and Christian stories convey big truths, and so do indeed rise to level of myth (instead of mere story). I assume, however, that you didn't mean to complement Western tradition in that way. --Icowrich (talk) 19:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me, but the definition of "myth", in english, is certainly not a "big truth", regardless of the etymology of the word. Dear IP who started this thread, can you give examples of the unbalance you claim between how different religious texts are referred to? In general I do agree that there should be no difference between how much hinduism and the Bible are considered myths. Either call both myths or none. GreyWinterOwl (talk) 16:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Milton's Paradise Lost

It is my personal opinion that John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost should be added to the list at the top of the page of significant Western epic poems. It is one of the best known and best written examples of English blank verse and epic poetry in the West. Is anyone of the same opinion? Could we reach a consensus? --Alrocks334 02:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Conventions In Epics

This section includes this as a convention of Epics:

Writer invokes a Muse, one of the nine daughters of Zeus. The poet prays to the Muses to 
provide him with divine inspiration to tell the story of a great hero.

This would only apply to epics from cultures influenced by Classical mythology. It seems overbroad to include it among conventions of all epic poetry. I'm going to add a {{Fact}} tag to this one.

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 17:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Why not just add its a convention of classical western epics? I'm no expert, but I think its reasonably important as a convention that is often worked with or against in later literature. (John User:Jwy talk) 04:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll give it a tweak; feel free to modify as you see fit (of course).

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 14:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The "attempted delineation of the epic form,' or however exactly it was phrased, is far too specific. It seems to be a list of charictaristics of the style of Homer and those directly inspired, and should be either edited or removed. This is only emphisised by the fact that it has no citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.233.32.17 (talk) 23:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Irish Epics

The Ulster and Fenian Cycles should be added. (Tain Bo Cualgne, etc.)

The Canterbury Tales

Surely, this is not to be considered an epic? It is a collection of firesode yarns spun, for the most part, in couplets of iambic pentameter. It has been shovelled unceremoniously into the 'epic' basket on account of its length amd prominent position in the history of english literature. Please, lets be more careful about how we use the word. The 'Tales' are a worthier candidate then many for the term.

Eliot

Why are 'The Waste Land'and 'Four Quartets' grouped under 'Other' epics when clearly wrtten in verse? Simply because they do not fit in with the prevalent traditions epic poetry does not mean that they should be separated from the group all together. They are poetry, and should be listed as such or not as epic at all.

More likely the latter. I've not read Four Quartets, but The Waste Land is certainly not an epic by any reasonable definition of the word. john k (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Neither Four Quartets or The Waste Land are anywhere close to epics in length, material, aim, tone or convention. Nor are either satirical of epics. DMC (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Prose, Epos and Epic vs. Lyric

My comment bears on the 'prose', 'epos' and 'epic vs lyric' sections in the talk page above, and relates to the first two sentences of the article:

"The epic is a broadly defined genre of narrative poetry, characterized by great length, multiple settings, large numbers of characters, or long span of time involved. As a result of this change in the use of the word, many prose works of the past may be retroactively called "epics" which were not composed or originally understood as such."

I agree with the definition in the first sentence, that seems pretty uncontentious. When the second sentence claims a "change in use of the word", though, I get confused. Change? Surely it is the use of 'epic' as a cinematic genre that involves the change in definition. The first sentence pretty much describes how Aristotle defines the epos in his Poetics, no? There is a trinity of terms in classical poetics: the lyric, the epos and the drama. The poet turns his back on the audience and addresses his muse, the poet sings directly to the audience about matters of civic concern, the poet speaks indirectly through the mask of characters. In a very schematic way, which I know some aestheticians contest (Szondi objects to the easy schematization, I seem to remember), this gives us : lyrical - the poem - mood and emotion / dramatic - the drama - interpersonal mimesis / epic - the novel - diegetic narrative. There is no inherent association in Aristotle between the epic and verse, I seem to remember. DionysosProteus 04:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Ronald Johnson and Herman Melville

Johnson's Ark and Melville's Clarel should be added to the list of epics at the end; they are two of the three "completed" American epic poems (Zukofsky's A is the other).

71.199.8.10 07:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Leaves of Grass

Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass is not an epic. It is a collection of poems. It should be removed from this list. 24.7.158.72 (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

What about mock epics?

I think the mock epic has an honourable history that ought to be acknowledged. A particular favourite of mine is Charles Charming's Challenges on the Pathway to the Throne by Clive James. Andy.hawthorn (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

in medias res

I strongly, strongly dispute that beginning in medias res is a defining characteristic of an epic. Basically, Homer starts in medias res, particularly the Odyssey, which then loops back to give a long flashback (the Iliad just starts in the middle of the war, but doesn't do the flashback thing). Later epic writers who were influenced by Homer imitated this characteristic of the Odyssey - particularly Virgil in the Aeneid (with Aeneas narrating to Dido about his previous adventures) and Milton in Paradise Lost (with Raphael telling Adam and Eve about the war in heaven).

But it's certainly not a cross-cultural characteristic of epics. It doesn't even apply to most classical epics - the other poems in the epic cycle do not seem to have been constructed in this way (the Cypria, for instance, just tells a narrative of the events leading up to the beginning of the Iliad). Apollonius' Argonautica and Statius' Thebaid seem to have also been straightforward narratives, so it seems as though only Virgil of the later "literary" epic writers actually imitated Homer in this regard. Of later western epics, the Divine Comedy certainly doesn't follow this format, either.

Nor, from what I can gather, do most non-western epics follow this format. From what I can gather the Indian epics do not, nor does Gilgamesh. Nor, from a different place, do medieval European epics - Beowulf starts with Scyld Shefing, for instance.

I strongly think that this should be removed as a defining characteristic of epics. Obviously, some very famous epics use this format (most notably, the Odyssey, the Aeneid, and Paradise Lost), but when the exceptions are more numerous than the examples, we should be very wary of saying these define epics.

It's also noteworthy that much other classical literature which is not epic also begins in medias res. I think particularly of the various Athenian tragedies, which always start more or less in the middle of the story (Iphigenia is long dead before the Oresteia begins; Oedipus has already killed his father and married his mother years before Oedipus Rex starts; and so forth), and are certainly not epics. john k (talk) 00:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the preceding writer, and I would like to add that not all epics are characterized by a vast setting. For example, the Iliad takes place entirely in the region of Troy (in what is now northwestern Turkey) and it involves only two peoples, the Greeks and the Trojans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.78.220 (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

More text before list

I feel that this article could probably go a little deeer into the difference between epic poems and non-epic poems before beginning a list. Critical analysis from T.S. Eliot and others surely would do well here, pressing the case for the classification and the problems with its use in historical contexts. Mrathel (talk) 16:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

"National" Epics

Could someone take a look at National epic and see if there's any way to improve it, or determine if it shouldn't just be deleted? It's almost entirely subjective and unsourced, with people adding and subtracting based on their personal opinions and little else. Is there any information in that article that isn't covered sufficiently on this one? The only thing that might be a problem is the prose epic section, which is pretty interesting. If it's needed and based on anything solid, it might just warrant its own (decent) article.Merpin (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Moving the Táin

I'm moving the Táin Bó Cúailnge to the 7th century; while its events are dated to the 1st, the earliest literature about the story is thought to be from the 7th, and the "full" version appears in a late-11th/early 12th century manuscript. Of course, that's prose, not poetry, and so aren't we stretching the term a bit if we even include it? MaryJones (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Poetic Edda

The Poetic Edda is not an epic it is a collection of mythological poems and wisdom poetry, it does not tell an extended story. It should be removed from the list, which I am about to do... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.17.130 (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

acholi language from gulu

can you make sentences in english then translate them into acholi language for me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.201.198 (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Narrative poems?

I've realized that most epic poems listed in the article for epic poetry are actually narrative poems,any poems containing a story is a narrative poem but not all of them are epic. Some of the poems are not epics neither in intention nor in subject-matter, nor in style; maybe, it would be better to open a new article for all of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpa20 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

A common confusion in this list is between epics and romances (including chansons de geste). Both are, of course, forms of narrative poetry, but that is insufficient to characterize an epic. Romances focus on a small group of characters (e.g. a heroic protagonist, his lord, his lover, his friend, his rival, and his enemy) and their interactions, and use the narrative structure as a way to elicit emotion, with whatever events take place in the background merely highlighting those moments of passion, pathos, tragedy, and so forth.

Epic is the reverse; in an epic, which typically has a larger cast of characters, the events -- or even one big event -- are paramount, and while there may be romantic episodes, those are subordinated to the purpose of giving context to the story. Both an epic and a romance may deal with a hero fighting in battle, for instance; but in the epic, the question to be resolved is whether the battle is lost or won, and what that means for the sides or causes involved; the focus on the hero is only to humanize the event. Whereas in the romance, the question to be resolved is whether the hero lives or dies or is wounded, and how that will affect his friends and enemies. Parzival is preeminently a romance; it's about the growth and development of one main character. And while there are battles and wars going on in the background, they are only backdrops for his character development. Whereas in the Iliad, we are concerned not so much with Hector or Achilles as with the fundamental question of whether Troy will stand or fall.RandomCritic (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

In Our Time

The following was posted in Talk:The_Epic by User:Rich Farmbrough. I think it was meant to end up here.

The BBC programme In Our Time presented by Melvyn Bragg has an episode which may be about this subject (if not moving this note to the appropriate talk page earns cookies). You can add it to "External links" by pasting * {{In Our Time|The Epic|p00548t1}}.

Scalzi+ | (Talk | contribs) 15:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Huge Number of Medieval Epics Missing!

The Arthurian epics in Old French by Chrétien de Troyes should be added. Also the epics in Middle High German, such as Heinrich von Veldekes 'Eneit' (a retelling of the Aenead), Wolfram von Eschenbach's 'Parzival' (it is incredible that Wagner's opera Parsifal is listed, but not the epic it is based upon) and many more. The Medieval German languaged writers were very prolific in epics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.81.106.89 (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

20th century epic poems (examples)

just pointing out one omission: I believe John Berryman's Dream Songs needs to be included. It is not merely a collection of related poems; it is indeed a single poem, a story. This is a prime contemporary example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.111.20 (talk) 09:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Awkward balance in lede

To balance Parry-Lord, the lede currently has this statement: "Nonetheless, epics have been written down at least since the works of Virgil, Dante Alighieri, and John Milton." The 1300 year span between Verg. and Dante here makes the sentence ridiculous enough, but a centimeter away on my screen is an image of a Gilgamesh tablet. Does someone with a broader epic knowledge than me want to make all this less awkward. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I've decided to be bold and remove this nonsensical and unscholarly statement. I think that as Parry's argument stood against the countervailing concept of primarily written epic it is worth mentioning, but there is no need to then restate the obvious fact that epics have been written down in the introduction. The earliest known Eastern and Western epics all survived in written forms, even if they were orally composed or initially transmitted orally. While I was at it I removed the reference to Lewis' idea of primary and secondary epics which is not in keeping with modern scholarship about the nature of the epic tradition - it is crude both to say that Homer was writing as a kind of history alone and that Milton was writing a purely literary story. The idea of primary and secondary epic should be discussed later because of its influence and partial utility, but putting it here distorts the opening of the article. Sorry for the anon edit - some day I'll get around to making an account, and when I have time I'll spruce up the article. 163.1.121.87 (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

The Yoruba epics

The following are under Medieval epics, 11th century right now:

- Moremi, a part of the Yoruba corpus of divine traditions. It is commonly considered to be a continuation of the story of Oduduwa, the protagonist's father-in-law.
- Oduduwa, a part of the Yoruba corpus of divine traditions. Although the period that the dynastic section of the corpus describes is commonly believed to be the 11th century, its divine section deals with the origin of the world itself, and the holy Yoruba city of Ile-Ife is known to be an ancient settlement that dates to a time long before the birth of Christ. Due to this being the case, it may well be safe to assume that the earliest aspects of the corpus are from the ancient era.
- Oranyan, a part of the Yoruba corpus of divine traditions. It is commonly considered to be a continuation of the story of Oduduwa, the protagonist's father.

None of the linked articles reference these epic poems, there is very little Google evidence for their existence, and everything said about the dating of the middle one definitely needs a citation. Does anyone have any knowledge of these? -Senori (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Requested move(s)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Whether Epic should remain a disambiguation page or should be converted to a different form was not resolved here. Dekimasuよ! 23:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Epic poetry → Epic
Epic → Epic (disambiguation)

– There is no good reason why "epic" should be a disambiguation page. An "epic" is a long poem such as the Iliad, Beowulf, Paradise Lost, etc. (If you don't know what an epic exactly is, look it up in a decent dictionary.) The page "Epic poetry" clearly is the primary usage of "epic", and ought thus be moved to the page "epic". Michael! (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Oppose per nominator's rationle that I agree with: if I don't know what an epic is, which I don't, how am I supposed to know that I'm looking for this? I'd be better off looking at a disambiguation page. In fact, in recent times, the subject in Epic (2013 film) actually comes to my mind first, but I don't believe that should be a primary topic either given the use of the word in other cases. Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose the most common usage in the modern day is not epic poetry, it is epic film. Even in literature, it is not epic poetry, but epic fantasy that is the most common usage in lit. We even have a broad concept article that covers epic poetry and epic film together with epic fantasy epic (genre) that would be a better choice than the poetry article. -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Support as proposed (as per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC's lasting significance criterion) but I would also counterpropose a WP:CONCEPTDAB as a possible resolution. Obviously the usage of "epic" as an encyclopedia article is what matters here, and I'd say that generally refers to epic poetry. Red Slash 19:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Support. See here for evidence that the type of film is still not much talked about and has only been talked about since the '20s (and mainly since the '60s). Srnec (talk) 19:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not sure that either poetry or film is the primary topic. Since the meaning of "epic" is ambiguous, better to leave it as a disambiguation page. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I would make a WP:DABCONCEPT article here for the general sense of a broad and sweeping story told in any media. This is covered at Epic (genre), but that article would need to be much improved to occupy this title. bd2412 T 19:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment Epic (noun) is a long poem, such as the Aeneid, Mahabharata, Nibelungenlied, etc. Epic (mass noun) is the "genre of epics". In compounds such as "epic film", and "epic fantasy", epic is an adjective (primary meaning "relating to or characteristic of an epic or epics" (quotation from the Oxford Dictionary of English, 2010), not a noun. However, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon or usage guide, so I don't see why the page epic should discuss all different usages of the word "epic". Instead, epic should discuss the primary usage. I can't understand Wikipedia's primary meaning would be something else than what's taught to 11 and 12 year old children at school, i.e. a long narrative poem which has existed for some 3-4000 years. Michael! (talk) 08:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Actually other dictionaries (for instance, collins, random house) and literature disagree with your rendering of the Oxford dictionary. In particular they carry epic as a noun for other genres as well and not just as adjective. The "counter example" of sorts to "epic film" (adjective) would be "Hollywood epic" (noun) (see [1]). For another comparison Britannica's entry for epic starts with "long narrative poem recounting heroic deeds, although the term has also been loosely used to describe novels".--Kmhkmh (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Oppose - "Epic poetry" is a good clear name, often used. No good reason to move this page. Therefore the other change suggested need not take place. Andrew Dalby 08:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose whether "epic poetry" is a good name or not is of no consequence for the disambiguation structure. If author/editors at "epic poetry" feel the term is not appropriate or rarely used and prefer the use of "epic" then they can change the article's name to "epic (poetry)" in analogy to the novel case. There is however no need to change the disambiguation page "epic" for that. The current "epic (disambiguation)" as redirect is not needed can be deleted in doubt.--Kmhkmh (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment (last one) All right, I realize there is more opposition than support for my proposal. There seems to be no broad concensus for a move, therefore the status quo should be mantained.

However, I would like to have one thing clear. I'm not at all opposed to epic poem, epic poetry, epic (poetry), epic (genre), epic (literary genre), epic literature, etc. Nor do I claim other usages of "epic" do not exist. I'm only opposed to the fact that epic is a disambiguation page, as if a primary usage couldn't be established.

"A topic is primary for a term, with respect to long-term significance, if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term."

Honestly, I can't see there is any serious candidate other than the poem. Yes, other dictionaries and encyclopedias often list other usages, but they always put the poem first, leaving no doubt about the primary usage and meaning of "epic". Michael! (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

PS Apple is not a disambiguation page. It's about the primary meaning, i.e. the fruit and its tree. There are other "apples", including a certain twentieth century firm, whose products are well known and often discussed in popular media in recent years, but those are listed at apple (disambiguation). Other words with several well established and different usages (e.g. Turkey, Pluto) are not disambiguation pages either... Michael! (talk) 10:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Exactly. What's worse is that, whereas the firm Apple, the turkey bird and the god Pluto are clearly defined, well-studied topics with no dearth of reliable sources for their articles, the general sense of "epic" that is usually put forward as a competitor for primary meaning with the poetic genre is neither well-defined nor well-studied and epic (genre) (as if epic poetry isn't a genre) languishes. As Kmhkmh's preferred definition has it: "loosely used to describe novels". Srnec (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.