Jump to content

Talk:Epic (Faith No More song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Amazing, nobody knows what it is yet? :P

masturbation? sex? raping?

I think it's life.

--Cacumer 00:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read an interview with Mike Patton where he said that the song has no meaning whatsoever. But I can't find it anywhere, so no way am I adding it to the article... talk about unsourced! -- DocSigma 14:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I found what you're referring to. According to fnm.com, Mike Patton said the following:
I think that too many people think too much about my lyrics. I am more a person who works with the sound of a word than with its meaning. Often I just choose the words because of the rhythm not because of the meaning.
There's no other reference to this quote on the web, but I think we can trust fnm.com as being a reliable source on this particular subject. --DrLeebot 00:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, but that would be quite a good answer! Maybe there's a Google Video or YouTube somewhere with that interview. I think I probably can find some relevant text, but it would most likely not be Mike's own words. Still, no subject / no meaning seems to lead to best stuff about life, remarkbly Seinfeld. --Caue (T | C) 00:44, Thursday 2006-07-27 (UTC)
I think it should be said that at the end of this song there is a piano solo that was originaly done by Midnight Oil, in the song Tin Legs and Tim Mines!--24.15.31.42 03:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Angela Taylor 10 Jul 2007, 22:45[reply]

"It's It" is an ice cream novelty made in Burlingame, California, south of San Francisco. Under torture these guys will admit that's where they got the idea. Here's a shot of the building, which tens of thousands of people - including some rock musicians - drive by every day: http://www.itsiticecream.com/location.cfm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.40.19.30 (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else think the voice that says "What...is...it?!" at one point in the song sounds just like Zorak? Mike R (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Faith No More - Epic.jpg

[edit]

Image:Faith No More - Epic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrical themes and theories

[edit]

Although it was commercially very successful, "Epic" was a very complex and unusual song by the standards of the early '90s. Some perceive the lyrics as a reference to masturbation.[1] The lyrics also possess themes of rape. Other sources indicate that the lyrics may intertwine with people not being able to achieve what they want. Such as an accomplishment or goal. This contests to the "masturbation" conception stated above. Although, many people feel that the video for the song explains the second theory better. Which is not about sexual deviance at all, but more along the lines of people not acquiring what they desire most. For example, the fish at the end who dies without water.

There is also the possibility that the song's pervasive 'it' is a variable for whatever is the 'it' in modern culture. Various senses are tantalized throughout the song to give it a broader appeal. Any pop culture trend that disappears as quickly as it appears seems to fit as 'it'.

This entire section was original research, as far as I can tell. The reference looks promising, but is merely a link to the lyrics themselves, with no hint of interpretation. Lusanaherandraton 06:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Fair use rationale for Image:Faith No More - Epic.jpg

[edit]

Image:Faith No More - Epic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Burning Splash.png

[edit]

Image:Burning Splash.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:FNM Epic Sample.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • It's not possible to get the original single cover? (As opposed to a reissue cover?)
  • Say the exact release date in the lead.
    • Oh, you do later one. Just say it once in the second sentence.
  • "It peaked at #9" - spell out numbers and use "number" instead of "#" (general practice)... so "number nine"
    • (Check this throughout, except (generally) in discography areas.)
  • ""Epic" has been covered both in concerts and on the Kerrang Higher Voltage CD, a compilation of artists covering other songs, in this case Welsh rock band, The Automatic covered the song." - it makes sense, but it's a pretty tough read. Maybe split to two sentences, or else just reword some.
  • Needs info on recording/production and on the musical content. If there isn't much info out there, just use what you can. (Shameless plug:) My Happiness (song) is a recent FA which didn't have limitless amounts of content available.
  • I dunno if Songfacts is a reliable source.
  • The other refs need some formatting work... just the order that stuff is presented in, etc. You may find {{cite web}} useful (or just look at how it's done on other articles).

Hope these help! I've watchlisted here if you want to reply. Cheers, Giggy (talk) 07:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, Giggy; I've prepared myself a little to-do list called Project FA Epic; I think it encompasses my own observations and the stuff you suggested.
If you have ever uploaded an album or single cover to Wikipedia or the Commons, would you by any chance know how to acquire them? I know it won't be at the local Best Buy because this song has long faded into memory almost twenty years ago...Maybe I can download the song from iTunes and download the cover from there. What do you think?
--Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 02:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a dump

[edit]

"Mike Patton came up with the rap idea for this after all of the music was laid out. The rap fills in the holes in the verses and works real well there. For the break section that has the string bends, I kick in my Tube Screamer and DOD Flanger. I wrote the part at the end by overdubbing a bunch of keyboard parts on a 4-track. The fish in the video was brought down by some guy from a fish farm. After we filmed it they threw him back in the bucket and took him away. He lived. We made him famous."
Billy Gould from the Bass Guitar Transcription Book for the album, which I've yet to locate more info on. — Balthazar (T|C) 20:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

[edit]

"This song features a combination of heavy metal with rap, paving the way for rap metal and funk metal." -- certainly is original research, and not very good either. Cf. I'm the Man, from three years previous. A song by a metal band who actually worked with rap artists. Some original research on who the Beastie Boys worked with wouldn't go amiss either, before trashing this article with nonsense.--Rfsmit (talk) 02:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Rock Charts

[edit]

While I definitely remember the song getting played on Modern Rock radio in the Bay Area in 1990, I don't think it ever charted on that specific Billboard chart (http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/faith-no-more/chart-history/4583?f=377&g=Singles). The article says it peaked on the Modern Rock charts at #2. Can anyone prove that? It seems like their only charting songs on that survey were from "Angel Dust" (1992). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.125.55 (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


PLEASE MIND THAT THE category system of modern rock charts is rather stupid

at that time the stupid classification was not working

well NINE INCH NAILS 1989-92 were not successful on modern rock charts while UB40, ACE OF BASE and others were

-)) very stupid

KROQ was ahead of its time and they played this song

WHY ONE HIT WONDER ?

[edit]

why FAITH NO MORE was a one hit wonder ?

In Europe this song was a Flop it did not reach in the main markets despite UK (#25)

but only 3 years later (1992-93) THE band had at least one hit in europe with im easy reaching the top 10 in many markets

Angel Dust sold very well and at least 500,000 copies in germany alone But why one hit wonder ?

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Epic (Faith No More song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Epic (Faith No More song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epic (Faith No More song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]