Talk:Enzyme Function Initiative

United States: National Institutes of Health Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject National Institutes of Health.

National Institutes of Health

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Institutes of Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the National Institutes of Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Institutes of HealthWikipedia:WikiProject National Institutes of HealthTemplate:WikiProject National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health articles

Potential Conflict of Interest

Untitled

The Enzyme Function Initiative was listed on the Wikipedia page for the acronym EFI, but the page had not been created yet. The Wikipedia page for the CFG, another NIGMS Glue Grant Consortium, was used as 1) evidence that such consortia clear notability criteria and 2) as a guide on style and neutrality. I created this page then understanding that it needs to be vetted for neutrality as I serve as the EFI's executive director. I posted a request for feedback 4/28/2011, but did receive any as of yet.

Thank you for any assistance you can give on improving the article, especially in regards to neutrality/Wikipedia standards. Hjimker (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5/4/2011

I believe I have addressed many of the issues :

Its references would be clearer with a different or consistent style of citation, footnoting or external linking.

I used Chris Capoccia's template for the website and press release citations; I think the journal articles are fine per his corrections.

It needs additional references or sources for verification.

I was actually worried I was approaching overkill, but I added a sentence and citation to the first paragraph under organization. Are there additional areas of concern?

It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications.

Only 2/18 citations are from the EFI website. The other 16 are either from well-regarded peer-reviewed journals (11), government (4), or university (1) sources which I understood as third-party. Would you explain the areas of concern?

It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter.

I understand that this will remain indefinitely.

This page is a new unreviewed article.

As it has now been reviewed, could this flag be removed? Hjimker (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5/10/11 Changed made to address the following flags:

Its references would be clearer with a different or consistent style of citation, footnoting or external linking.

All in-line external references have been removed.

It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications.

I have removed many of the references to the EFI website and instead let referencing stand on Wikipedia pages or primary literature. Of the 26 in-line citations, 19 are to third party sources. The remaining refer to information about the EFI's specific organization and aims, which cannot be found elsewhere." Hjimker (talk) 19:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enzyme Function Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427131544/http://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/Results/gluegrant_051510.htm to http://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/Results/gluegrant_051510.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Enzyme Function Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]