Jump to content

Talk:Entoloma austroprunicolor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Entoloma austroprunicolor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 18:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I remember seeing this one at FPC. Nice looking article.

  • "(haven a central rounded elevation resembling a nipple)" I assume you mean "having"?
  • I'm not sure the link to adnation is useful, especially as it doesn't say anything about fungi
  • "stipe measures 3–7.5 cm (1.2–3.0 in) tall and" Long?
  • "cortex" Jargon
  • "contain granules that contain" Repetition
  • "and has different microscopic features.[3]" Seeing as it's a short section, perhaps you could expand on these features?
  • Just a thought, and there may not be much you can expand upon here, but if it's common, why was it only described so recently?

I made a few small edits. A literature search threw up nothing you'd missed- clearly not a species that's been written about much, but there's certainly enough here for GA status. J Milburn (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Sasata (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Happy with the fixes, and thanks for the clarification about why this was such a recent discovery. I'm going to go ahead and promote now- not the biggest or most exciting article, but seems to accurately reflect what has been published about this species. J Milburn (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]