Talk:Enlargement of NATO/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

General

• Please use either American English or British English, not both.

Lead

• Citations are unecessary.

Body

• Link Tbilisi

References

• The note requires a citation
• Seperate the notes and the citations
• Citation #139 doesn't point to any citation
• Both sfns and ref tags are unnecessary, only one type is needed
• Last source in the bibliography doesn't point to any citation.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello, thanks a million for taking this on! I've taken care of some of your suggested fixes today, and really appreciate the help. I have a question for you (and other editors!) about the Kosovo note: Do we still need it? It's a transcluded template with the suggested use of giving mentions of Kosovo some context (there's some recent discussion about it being out of date and needing sources). But we do give the context that Kosovo's independence isn't universally recognized in the following sentences, and its the only end note in the article. Maybe we can just include some of the note's text in the paragraph?-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 17:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

• • Okay with me.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • One more comment:
    • Expand the contractions "don't" and "doesn't".--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks again, I've incorporated the Kosovo note into the paragraph that it was coming from. Its easy enough to put back if other editors feel strongly about it, I know this article tries to walk a fine NPOV line with terminology when discussing the "Republic of Kosovo," or the "Republic of Macedonia," among others. Also took care of a contraction too.-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 16:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
        • Passing, Well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)