Talk:Enid MacRobbie
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]See the discussion at:
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass speedy deletion of Fellows of the Royal Society (permanent link)
This is one of a series of 32 articles about Fellows of the Royal Society that were erroneously deleted on the grounds of notability. Only leading scientists can become Fellows of the Royal Society and all have long since met the requirements of our Notability (academics) guideline by the time they become fellows.
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- If she is indeed a "noted scientist" then the reliable sources where she was noted would allow more than this directory listing. Write an encyclopedia article, like the one about Michael Faraday, or get rid of the mere directory listing. Edison (talk) 05:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Stub-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- Stub-Class Women scientists articles
- Unknown-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles