Talk:English land law

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

The following caption that accompanies the satellite image of Britain seems inaccurate "With 395 people per square kilometre, England has the highest population density in Europe". According to the Wikipedia page about population density the Netherlands has 406.51 people per square kilometre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.158.69.237 (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed content

The following information was in the caption of a non-free image used in this article.

"Among British families in 2001 there were 10m married couples with 7.5m children, and 2m unmarried cohabiting couples with 1.25m children.^[1]"

I've removed the image because its inclusion here cannot possibly be reasonably justified (it was a publicity photo for a British TV series). I don't know where else to put this info, nor could I find a good replacement image. Maybe someone else can. - dcljr (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ See Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [44]

Undue

I have removed the image of Grenfell Tower, as WP:UNDUE for this article.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

[1] See Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [44]

[1]