Talk:English in the Netherlands

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Untitled

May be somebody can help sourcing this. E.g. with the help of lonely planet guide. Andries (talk) 10:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I continue to hold the opinion that a law proposal to make English and official language in Amsterdam authored by two people is not a reliable source for the number of native speakers in Amsterdam. The authors had every reason to exaggerate the number of native speakers. Moreover the tone of the proposal is very promotional. I may take this to the reliable sources notice board. Andries (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After the original line about English in Amsterdam was removed, I added the following line: Additionally, a small number of English-speakers live across the country, particularly in the Amsterdam region. I think English, although a small language in NL, is large enough to be noted and in this way, I avoided the exact number of English-speakers and its status in Amsterdam. PPP (talk) 09:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ThreeNL

ThreeNL (and its YouTube-channel. It could just be notable in English-language television in the Netherlands, although it can be watched through the internet only and it looks like it just started. Hence I feel like it shouldn't get an article on Wikipedia just yet, and I always take caution in willingly creating red links. But if many agree, I'll add it. PPP (talk) 09:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on English in the Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521033643/http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/doc631_en.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/doc631_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]