Talk:English cricket team in Australia in 2017–18

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal English cricket team in Australia in 2017–18 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squad table

Hi. Here is the previous discussion. The standard of centring the table is used across all tour pages. Per WP:BRD anyone who wishes to change this must dicuss this and gain a consensus to do so. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silence is the weakest form of consensus there is. The tables are centred because one person made a unilateral decision to centre them, and now claims that consistency is a good enough reason to keep doing so, despite no actual reasoning for it other than "I like it". By default, all tables (nay, all content) on Wikipedia is left-aligned; that should not be overridden without a good reason to do so, and the only reason anyone has given so far is an opinion regarding the aesthetics of it. Something more substantial would be nice... – Pee Jay 23:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I point you to the discussion at WT:CRIC and the discussion at my talkpage with you and Blue Square Thing, which has the following comment :"Either format looks dreadful on a mobile browser in portrait mode, but the same is true of most table (a bullet format works much better if we're considering this as important). On a super-wide desktop monitor with full bowser width, I'd opt for centred I'm afraid PeeJay - sorry; but that's just my eye, I could well be wrong, but I think I'd tend towards keeping tables in whatever format they were first established unless there's an obvious reason not to do so - the "no actual squad" for a home side issue is the most obvious reason to remove them, perhaps". The burden is back with YOU to state why a long-standing consensus should be changed other that you don't like it. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you're going to conveniently ignore the bit where he said "sorry; but that's just my eye, I could well be wrong"? – Pee Jay 18:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]