This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
I edited much of the text, removing sentences that did not seem to make sense, or were blatant POV. I also cleaned up the grammar, spelling and punctuation. --BwB (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drive. Edit Log.
Removal of section, Renaissance, added by IP address 200.153.179.98 on 21:20, 7 April 2010. This completely un-blue-linked and unreferenced section was a blatant piece of essentially off-the-subject promotion; the article is about a defunct company, not its supposed revived counterpart. If this new company is notable, a new article for it should be written specifically for it, without the puffery. This text, with the rest of the article is mirrored here – Wikipedia tag. Strong possibility that text was added to Wikipedia, then back-referenced to Wikipedia to avoid copy-vio. Whatever the case, promotion of a company is not allowed. Acabashi (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Changed section header Products, (too promotional), to Production vehicles. Added historical text under section temporarily to main body text for editing. Where there were no examples of vehicles, type of vehicle removed. The mini descriptions of EE-9 Cascavel and EE-T1 Osório should be added to the vehicle’s own article if important. Acabashi (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sections Organization and Bankruptcy added into the main text of a short article. Template addition for more in-line cites. Added blue links. Not significant to mention how big the area of factories were, or that SUVs are similar to jeeps.
The disinterested, but only apparent, facts remain, but what remains is still un-cited. Please add more relevant independently referenced information to the article. However, given the previous blatant promotion, if anything is added, or the present changed, please do this with adequate linked evidence to corroborate assertions, and in an encyclopedic style. Any future edits that display Wikipedia:COI or non-Wikipedia:Verifiability and are added from a non-Wikipedia:Neutral point of view will be swiftly removed. Acabashi (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The company may have applied a lot of funds towards the Osorio, but it cannot have "invested its complete budget". It had other projects and work, and employed most of its staff on other projects.Royalcourtier (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
