Talk:Energy (Disclosure album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative The Guardian review

I've come across this review of the album by The Guardian, which grants it 5/5 stars. Now, users will notice that there is already a review by said publication in the article, one which ranks the album as 3/5 stars. Per WP:UNDUE, I believe this review should be included in the article, alongside the other review, in order to "fairly represent all significant viewpoints". Sean Stephens (talk) 01:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That review is actually the review from The Observer, which was already included in the album reviews template at the time you posted this. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 01:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30: Thank you. I was unaware that the review in question was initially published elsewhere. I appreciate you letting me know. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sean Stephens: Yeah, The Observer and The Guardian are owned by the same people, so basically The Observer ended up becoming the Sunday edition of The Guardian. It's confusing and it doesn't help that they share the same website. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 00:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30: Certainly is confusing! Thank you for taking the time to explain it, especially so politely. I appreciate it. Will keep that in mind in future. – Sean Stephens (talk) 03:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]