Talk:En Primera Fila/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mdann52 (talk · contribs) 17:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I feel that this is a clear pass, as it meets the GA criteria very well.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Overall, referencing appears ok, however, I am slightly doubtful about the reliability of the album cover notes, but I feel that enough notibility is shown elsewhere.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- As well as giving facts about the article, it gives the background and other accociated information about the article.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No means of leaving a NPOV are in there.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Nothing shows up as an edit war recently, if at all.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are appropriate, and tagged accordingly.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Clear pass, Good work!
- Pass/Fail: