Talk:En Foco

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Hispanic and Latino Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force.

Conflict of interest

This article was created by User:Enfoco (contributions) and expanded by User:Romais (contributions). The article describes Miriam Romais as coeditor of En Foco's magazine and the organization's Executive Director. -- Hoary (talk) 00:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary - it is true, it seemed silly to pretend otherwise (now, THAT would be a conflict of interest!). I also received a message from GB that suggested other folks from outside the organization can add & edit, so its no longer a conflict. As far as notability goes, there are over 30 years of articles, essays and publications for and about the organization. Some of the country's leading writers have contributed to its magazine, and curated its shows. I assume that would be acceptable & no longer a conflict of interest? (Romais (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Spoken well.

It's not the fault of En Foco that I, halfway around the Earth, know little of it. What little I know is impressive. En Foco definitely deserves an article. Now let's work to describe it as straightforwardly (even flatly) as possible. Its qualities should still be apparent.

More later; I'm already almost asleep (no fault of yours). -- Hoary (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I may make a comment: a conflict of interest is not necessarily an impediment to creating and maintaining a great article. Even if the subject of an article, or an employee of the subject of an article wishes to contribute, the same guidelines apply as to notability, reliable sources, verifiability, etc. The problem really occurs when people with a conflict of interest start saying things like "I know this is true" and "I am a verifiable source", which don't work. Frank | talk 16:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hee hee... understandable - we're always trying to fact check ourselves so I certainly understand the concept. I just tried entering a few more verifiable sources but it doesn't seem to be saving (Dos Mundos exhibition took place in 1973 at the New York Cultural Center in NYC). (Romais (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on En Foco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007114741/http://www.ebtrust.org.uk/news/doc_photo_workshop.html to http://www.ebtrust.org.uk/news/doc_photo_workshop.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on En Foco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628063207/http://www.enfoco.org/index.php/photographers/photographer/rivera_ortiz_manuel/ to http://www.enfoco.org/index.php/photographers/photographer/rivera_ortiz_manuel/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]