Talk:Employment cost index

Please do not change this back to what is was before.

I work for the BLS and WE produce the ECI, not the BEA.

aca

ddca

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved Uncontroversial requested move.. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Employment Cost Index → Employment cost index –

WP and almost all other sources downcase CPI when expanded. The ECI might well be produced by the US government, but so what: so is its version of the CPI. The ECI is now in the same category in real life/language as the other well-known indexes. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles.

Just a few examples:

[1]
Following is the text of the employment cost report released by the Labor Department" ... unsure why people would downcase this and then upcase the index it's referring to.
[2] (upcased in their title, but not in their main text).
[3]

Plus many more.

I didn't move this name in case there might be real objections. So here's the RM. $Tony (talk)$ 09:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support – suggest speedy close as non-controversial; straightforward MOS:CAPS backed up by evidence in sources (google books). Dicklyon (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.