Talk:Employee monitoring

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Employee monitoring is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kevin Moline, Nicole.lallier, Aaronm3, Emmaras.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is it internationally legal? Are there no examples for scandals? Some scandals and trials for Germany are listed in de:Mitarbeiterüberwachung. Simplicius (talk) 06:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The last paragraph in "Location Monitoring" and the "Employee privacy and ethical issues" section seem to be very partial and opinionated. Should this be edited to be more objective? Meijin3 (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Employee monitoring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a lot of strong text already but I think incorporating supporting images would be helpful for the reader. Nicole.lallier (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are some chunky sentences that could use editing. I think when we add our new information, we should try and revise what is already there as well. Nicole.lallier (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also seeing a lack of information overall, blocking it up with examples and sources can be a starting point in editing Emmaras (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

-Under "Legal Issues," the last few paragraphs could be simplified. It appears as though they were written academically, whereas they should be simple, neutral statements so that anyone can understand them.

-While there are links to other articles under some of the topics, there could be some brief explanation of what it is and how it relates to employee monitoring.

Emily Roeder (talk) 03:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-The legal issues category seems to be a bit wordy. Maybe it would help to break them down. Some of the other articles do not seem to be established enough. I would focus on building up information on these articles and taking out quotes and paraphrasing K.bentzen1 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the links to "illegal software" and "company policy" because they led to creating a new Wiki page aka nowhere. Nicole.lallier (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added: "The enormity of potential productivity loses, as reported by Court (2004), is approximately one million dollars annually for a company with 500 employees surfing the Internet for just a half hour a day." ^[1] Not only does employee monitoring prevent theft of money and resources, but it also prevents theft of time and to make sure people are doing what they are supposed to be doing in the workplace.Nicole.lallier (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ {http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2013/volume1_2/OJAKM_Volume1_2pp44-55.pdf], more text.

[1] {http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2013/volume1_2/OJAKM_Volume1_2pp44-55.pdf], more text.

[1]