Talk:Empire Circus

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Tone/refs/COI

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Contributors seeking to use Wikipedia as a means to promote their wares (like an upcoming album) should read WP:COI, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and any number of related policies which set out the expectations for suitably balanced and referenced contributions.

Also, Wikipedia is not NME or Hot Press, so music journo flourishes like "during a very cold February in New York" or woolly editorial flourishes like "some time was taken to gather thoughts and energies" serve only as flowery bumf and have no place on the project. (And don't get me started on outrightly subjective and entirely unattributed opinions like "This is Empire Circus most mature and sonically rich album to date".)

Unless this most recent codology can be addressed, the article will need to be reverted to this "pre-recent promo" state. Or pared back to an otherwise basic/balanced/referenced state. Guliolopez (talk) 00:52, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved Not having heard anything back on the above, I have gone ahead with the summarisation (or outright removal) of promo/etc. Guliolopez (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]